Legal Opinion

US EX REL. TENN. VALLEY MARBLE v. Grunley Const.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 17, 2006No. Civil Action No. 04-1616 (RCL)Published

1Opinion of the Court

433 F.Supp.2d 104 (2006)

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. TENNESSEE VALLEY MARBLE HOLDING COMPANY, Plaintiff,

v.

GRUNLEY CONSTRUCTION, et al., Defendants.

Civil Action No. 04-1616 (RCL).

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

May 17, 2006.

Niccolo N. Donzella, Siobhan R. Keenan, Baxter, Baker, Sidle, Conn & Jones, PA, Baltimore, MD, for Plaintiff.

Herman M. Braude, Michael A. Lewis, Braude & Margulies, P.C., Washington, DC, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on four motions. First, defendant Atlantic filed a Motion [44] for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API