Acme Tile and Terrazzo Co. And Roman Tile & Terrazzo Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
The present controversy has been before this Court once before. It arises out of the actions of various employers alleged to have violated the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (“Act”). The Board originally found that the employers violated the Act by conditioning continued employment on union membership and terminating employees who failed to join the union. We remanded to the Board to make additional findings. NLRB v. Acme Tile & Terrazzo Co., 984 F.2d 555 (1st Cir.1993). After doing so, it reached the same conclusion. Satisfied that the Board…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Jaime Andino D/B/A Jaime Andino Trucking v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yesterday's Children, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Bsp Trans, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor, Robert Michaud, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union Local 26Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Raymond Interior Systems, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- BSP Trans, Inc. v. USDOLCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.