Legal Opinion

Drexel Chemical Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 5, 2003No. Court 98-02-00295-SPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge:

This action concerns the proper classification of certain entries of Diuron Technical and Diuron 80-WP herbicides imported from Malaysia between March 1993 and March 1994 by Plaintiff Drexel Chemical Company (“Drexel”). The United States Customs Service, now organized as the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, (“Customs”) classified the entries of Diuron Technical under subheading 2924.21.1500 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), which specifies a duty rate of 13.5% ad valorem, and Diuron 80-WP under HTSUS subheading 3808.30.1000…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. The Torrington Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Koru North America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  4. Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Azteca Milling Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API