Legal Opinion

Torrington Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 24, 1984No. Court 81-3-00315PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CARMAN, Judge:

The respective parties in this matter seek judgment upon a stipulation of agreed facts filed in lieu of a trial. Jurisdiction lies in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1982), and the question before the court is one of law.

The subject of this action is industrial sewing machine needles manufactured in and exported from Portugal to the United States. At the time of exportation, Portugal was designated as a beneficiary developing country (BDC) pursuant to the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), see Trade Act of 1974, § 502, 19 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas Instruments, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  2. PISTORINO & COMPANY, INC. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. The Torrington Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Azteca Milling Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Azteca Milling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  4. F.F. Zuniga A/c Refractarios Monterrey, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. Madison Galleries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API