Legal Opinion

Dan River, Inc. v. Icahn

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1983No. 82-2014PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:

On November 12, 1982, the district court granted a preliminary injunction which prohibited the appellants, Carl C. Icahn and several companies under his control,1 from exercising the voting rights appurtenant to any shares owned or acquired in Dan River, Inc., the appellee here. The temporary injunction was to endure until a full scale trial on the merits, scheduled for February 1983, could take place. Because the parties were in the midst of a heated battle for corporate control, we agreed to hear Icahn’s appeal on an expedited basis. Our order reversing the district…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Direx Israel, Ltd. Direx, Incorporated v. Breakthrough Medical Corporation Zvi Porath Avner SpectorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. In re Microsoft Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  4. SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API