InCompass IT, Inc. v. XO Communications Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
InCompass IT, Inc. and HLI, LLC (collectively, “InCompass”) filed suit against XO Communications Services, Inc. and XO Communications, LLC (collectively “XO”), asserting a single claim of promissory es-toppel based on a former XO employee’s alleged oral promise to enter into a multi-year lease with InCompass. Following a bench trial, the district court 1 entered judgment in XO’s favor. On appeal, In-Compass asserts that the district court erred in granting XO’s motion to strike InCompass’s jury trial demand. We affirm the district court’s grant of XO’s motion to strike…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Toomey v. DahlDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- National Presto Ind., Inc. v. U.S. Merchants Fin. Grp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
- Goettsch v. GoettschDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2014
- Hatfield v. Tony PiraniDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2024
- In Re: RFC and RESCAP Liquidating Trust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.