Legal Opinion

DeJesus v. Bertsch, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 16, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-11563-WGYPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a products liability case brought under a successor liability theory. The main issue presented to this Court is whether the successor corporation, Park Corporation (“Park”), is liable for the torts of its predecessor, Bertsch, Inc. (“Bertsch”), under the de facto merger or “mere continuation” exceptions to the usual rules of successor liability.

Park argues that the de facto merger doctrine is inapplicable to the facts of this case because there was neither continuity of shareholders nor was there any other indicia of Bertsch…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Riley v. Lexmar Global Inc. (In re Progression Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  2. ACI Construction v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
  3. Lotus Foods Boston, LLC v. Go Fresh 365, Inc. and Long DengDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API