Legal Opinion

Moore v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1969No. B-891PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALVERT, Chief Justice.

The respondents, as plaintiffs, sought a trial court judgment declaring that certain *553building and use restrictions imposed by a written instrument on lots in “Shadyside”, an exclusive residential subdivision of the City of Houston, were of permanent or indefinite duration, and, alternatively, for other relief, the nature of which is unimportant to our decision. Petitioners, as defendants, sought a judgment declaring that the restrictions would terminate on June 30, 1969, and, alternatively, that they were invalid, ineffective and unenforceable.

The trial court rendered…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fox v. ThoresonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Abernathy v. AdoueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. State v. ReeceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Morton v. SaylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Cornett v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. INWOOD NORTH HOMEOWNERS'ASS'N v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hal Rachal, Jr. v. John W. ReitzTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Munson v. Milton, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  4. Gulf Oil Corporation v. Southland Royalty CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Travis Heights Improvement Ass'n v. SmallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API