Legal Opinion

Levi Strauss and Company v. Fuller Longley and J. P. Browder, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 19, 1959No. 13805PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This case has been duly considered on the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys and upon the record in the case. The action, brought by Levi Strauss and Company, was for infringement of its registered trademark, stitched on the back pockets of western style overalls and jeans. The trademark has been termed an “arcuate” design.

The trial court described the trademark of appellant as consisting of two equal arcs, lying substantially horizontally across the rear pocket. The mark used by defendants, now appellees, is in general appearance similar to that of appellant, but differs in that it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  3. Hemmeter Cigar Co. v. Congress Cigar Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Alexander Young Distilling Co. v. National Distillers Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc., and Textiles Y Confecciones Europeas, S.A. v. Levi Strauss & Company, Defendant-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc., and Textiles Y Confecciones Europeas, S.A. v. Levi Strauss & Company, Defendant-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API