Legal Opinion

Klicker v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 21, 1972No. 43094PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Milton D. Mason, Justice. *

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to an order dismissing that portion of their complaint which alleges that Minn. St. 1969, c. 173, constitutes a taking of property rights without just compensation. The action was for declaratory and injunctive relief.

The questions for determination are: (1) May appellants attack the constitutionality of Minn. St. 1969, c. 173, by presenting evidence that the amortization therein provided is a taking of property without just compensation? (2) Is a class action proper in these proceedings? (3) Is due process of law…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Grant v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Hoffmann v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Federal Distillers, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Lucas v. Pioneer, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. Forcier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Robbinsdale Education Ass'n v. Robbinsdale Federation of Teachers Local 872Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API