Legal Opinion

Chilcott v. Washington State Colonization Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1906No. 6299PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered March SO, 1906, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on a contract of employment.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This is an action instituted by the plaintiffs, Richard Chilcott and S. Grabowski, against the defendants, Washington State Colonization Company, a corporation, and W. C. Harding, to recover compensation for services rendered. The plaintiffs alleged, that the defendants had employed them’ to seek out logged-off lands which were for sale, and place the defendants in communication with the owners, so that they might negotiate for the purchase of such lands; that it was agreed that, if the defendants, or either of them, should purchase any such lands, they would pay the plaintiffs twenty-five…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carrigan v. Port Crescent Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Singer Construction Co. v. GoldsboroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Meyer v. Nator Holding Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. W. E. Moses Land Scrip & Realty Co. v. Stack-Gibbs Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Kitzmiller v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Ulrich v. Pateros Water Ditch Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API