Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Chapter One
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 22, 2011No. Civil Action 10-1362 (EGS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
This action involves certain dietary supplements that defendants claim can treat, cure, or prevent cancer, inhibit tumors, and ameliorate the adverse effects of radiation and chemotherapy. Pending before the Court is the government’s motion for a preliminary injunction. In its motion, the government asks the Court to preliminarily enjoin Daniel Chapter One and James Feijo (the “defendants”) from violating the final cease and desist order issued by the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) on January 25, 2010 regarding the marketing of these…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Sherley v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States of America Department of Justice v. Daniel Chapter OneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- United States of America Department of Justice v. Daniel Chapter OneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012