Legal Opinion

State v. Hoffman

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1992No. 14931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MOON, J.

Defendant-appellant Michael R. Hoffman (Hoffman) appeals from his conviction for unlawful display of intoxicating liquor in . public areas, a violation of the Revised Ordinances of Honolulu § 13-4.2. At trial, the court allowed the arresting officer to testify regarding Hoffman’s silence following an incriminatory statement made at the scene of the offense by an unidentified male, who did not testify at trial. On appeal, Hoffman contends that the trial court erred in admitting such hearsay testimony under the adoptive admission exception to the hearsay rule.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Emslie Leander Moore, United States of America v. Floyd Moore, United States of America v. Pieter Cornelis PannekoekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. People v. ManisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Blue v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. GanoHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. SuaHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. FieldsHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. KetchumHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. Ah LooHawaii Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API