Legal Opinion

HOWARD v. ARCONIC INC

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 2021No. 2:17-cv-01057Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARTIN HOWARD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) 2:17-cv-1057 ) v. ) ) ARCONIC INC., ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) ) OPINION Mark R. Hornak, Chief United States District Judge This Court previously granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint and dismissed the First Amended Complaint in its entirety and without prejudice with leave to amend. (ECF Nos. 106, 107.) Plaintiffs seized the opportunity to amend and filed a Second Amended Complaint, which Defendants have again moved to dismiss in its entirety.…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API