Legal Opinion
Rich v. Mayor of Baltimore
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 19, 1972No. [No. 345, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellants, Edward L. Rich, Jr., et ux., complain because a Baltimore City judge sustained a demurrer to their declaration, without leave to amend, on the ground that they had failed to give the written notice required by what is now Code (1972 Repl. Vol.) Art. 57, § 18. His ruling was correct.
The incident in question occurred on June 14, 1968. The declaration was filed June 10, 1971, claiming that the City of Baltimore had “negligently and carelessly constructed and maintained [Roland Avenue] at or near the intersection of Wyndhurst Avenue.” At the time suit was filed § 18 provided in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Neuenschwander v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Cotham and Maldonado v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Ireland v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Simpson v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Conaway v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Wharf at Handy's Point, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Harlow v. SchrottCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008