Legal Opinion

State v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1924No. Nos. 23,859, 23,928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial and also from the judgment dismissing a proceeding under chapter 461, p. 708, Laws 1921, to enforce the payment of a tax on respondent’s automobile. The appeals were consolidated and heard on the same record and briefs.

The ultimate question to be determined is whether section 16 of the act contravenes section 3, art. 16, of the state Constitution, commonly known as the Babcock Amendment, reading in part as follows :

“The legislature is hereby authorized to provide by law for the taxation of motor vehicles using the public…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. State v. Royal Mineral Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Park v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. City of ElySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hassler v. EngbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Raymond v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. American Railway Express Co. v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. McReavy v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. State of Minnesota v. Renee Anita VaskoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API