Jose Campusano v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge:
The question presented in this case is whether an attorney who fails to file a notice of appeal requested by his client is constitutionally ineffective when the client waived appeal in his plea agreement. We hold that even after a waiver, a lawyer who believes the requested appeal would be frivolous is bound to file the notice of appeal and submit a brief pursuant to An-ders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). When counsel fails to do so, we will presume prejudice, as required by Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Garza v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- United States v. PoindexterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. ShedrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Robert Campbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Watson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.