Legal Opinion

Jose Campusano v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 23, 2006No. Docket 04-5134-PRPublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge:

The question presented in this case is whether an attorney who fails to file a notice of appeal requested by his client is constitutionally ineffective when the client waived appeal in his plea agreement. We hold that even after a waiver, a lawyer who believes the requested appeal would be frivolous is bound to file the notice of appeal and submit a brief pursuant to An-ders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). When counsel fails to do so, we will presume prejudice, as required by Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Garza v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. United States v. PoindexterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. ShedrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. Robert Campbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Watson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API