Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Chopra

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 14, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BRODY, J.A.D.

The issue in this appeal is whether the contract purchasers of real property satisfied the mortgage contingency clause in the contract when they obtained a mortgage commitment in an amount less than the amount stated in the clause. We hold that where, as here, the contingency may be waived by the purchasers, a mortgage in any amount that satisfies the purchasers also satisfies the contingency clause.

The parties entered into a contract for the sale of a five-family building by defendants (sellers) to plaintiffs (purchasers). The contract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wolf v. CrosbyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1977
  2. Dale Mortgage Bankers Corp. v. 877 Stewart Avenue AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Schroeder v. KrushevskiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Schultz v. TopakyanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  5. Schroeder v. KrushevskiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farrell v. JanikNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  2. Freedman v. Clonmel Const. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API