Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Topakyan
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 2, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
193 N.J. Super. 550 (1984)
475 A.2d 91
WAYNE A. SCHULTZ AND KIMBERLY K. SCHULTZ, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
HAROLD TOPAKYAN AND BERNICE TOPAKYAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 13, 1984.
Decided May 2, 1984.
Before Judges KING, DREIER and BILDER.
Arthur R. Carmano, Jr. argued the cause for appellants.
Andreas A. Boyadjis argued the cause for respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by BILDER, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).
This is an appeal by prospective purchasers of real property from a summary judgment dismissing their action for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- River Development Corp. v. Liberty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- River Development Corp. v. Liberty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Paradiso v. MazejySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Bertrand v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- River Development Corp. v. Liberty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lone v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Northeast Custom Homes, Inc. v. HowellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Freedman v. Clonmel Const. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Darrah Food Services, Inc. v. Lambertville House, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Friedman v. ChopraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.