Legal Opinion

Hinds v. City of Ocean Springs

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided April 6, 2004No. 2003-CA-00054-COAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SOUTHWICK, P.J.,

for the Court.

¶ 1. The Mayor and Board of Aldermen of the City of Ocean Springs granted a request to divide an acre lot into two lots. Several neighbors appeal and allege that insufficient notice was given of the matter, and that the decision was arbitrary and capricious. We find no error and affirm.

¶ 2. Shannon Moran owns a lot in Ocean Springs. There is no evidence in this record of its being part of an existing subdivision for which a survey plat had been duly recorded. The dimensions of the lot prior to the split was approximately 210 feet in width and 233 feet in depth.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Barnes v. Board of Sup'rs, DeSoto CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Petal v. Dixie Peanut Co.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API