State v. Padilla
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
Defendant appeals his jury conviction and sentence for robbery while armed with a deadly weapon in violation of Section 40A-16-2, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6, Supp.1973), and of battery in violation of 40A-3-4, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6). He alleges three points of error. We affirm.
The facts pertinent to defendant’s points of error will be set forth in the discussion of each point.
POINT I: “THE COURT ERRED AND ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN PROHIBITING EVIDENCE SUPPORTING DEFENDANT’S DEFENSE OF INSANITY.”
The answer to this point is factual. Defendant abandoned any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Novak v. DowNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- United States v. AurandtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1910
- Petritsis v. SimpierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Gray v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Territory of New Mexico v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. PAUL T.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. HouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. DawsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.