Legal Opinion

Petritsis v. Simpier

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1970No. 9005PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKENNA, Justice.

This appeal is also an outgrowth of the sale of a clothing retail business known as Duds for Dolls. See our opinion in Durrett v. Petritsis, 82 N.M. 1, 474 P.2d 487 filed today. It gives some of the background of this dispute.

Plere, Petritsis, the appellant, sued Mrs. Loretta Brady and the Tiptons on a $6,400 note signed by them. The amount of the note equaled the down payment of $6,000 for the business purchased from appellee Durrett, plus $400 advanced by Petritsis for working capital. We referred to this note in Durrett v. Petritsis, No. 8982, supra. Petritsis…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Durrett v. PetritsisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hutchison v. BoneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Rein v. DvoracekNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Irwin v. LámarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Martinez v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Las Luminarias of the New Mexico Council of the Blind v. IsengardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Garcia v. Garcia Ex Rel. Estate of GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Perez v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API