Barclays American Financial, Inc. v. Haywood
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred by granting Summary Judgment against her, based on the deemed admissions of her husband and co-defendant. We agree with defendant.
Pursuant to Rule 36(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, upon plaintiffs serving defendant with written requests for admissions, the matters contained in such requests are deemed admitted unless answered or objected to by defendant within the requisite time, i.e., thirty days. In the case, sub judice, on 26 April 1982, plaintiff served defendant, Conrad Haywood,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- In re Folding Carton Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
- GENERAL AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY v. DouglassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- United States v. WheelerDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
- Zickgraf Hardwood Co. v. SeayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cambridge Homes of North Carolina Ltd. Partnership v. Hyundai Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- HIEN NGUYEN v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Millikan v. Guilford Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Marting v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Global Textile All., Inc. v. Tdi Worldwide, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2018