Legal Opinion

Royal Thai Government v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 6, 2007No. Consol. 02-00026PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Senior Judge.

This matter is before the Court following a court-ordered remand on July 26, 2006. See Royal Thai Gov’t v. United States, 30 CIT-, 441 F.Supp.2d 1350 (2006) (“Royal Thai III”).

I. BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History of This Case

In December 2000, Commerce initiated an investigation into whether the Thai steel industry received various countervail-able subsidies. See Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Argentina, India, Indonesia, South Africa, and Thailand, 65 Fed.Reg. 77580 (Dep’t Commerce Dec. 12, 2000) (notice of initiation of countervailing duty…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nucor Fastener Division v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  2. Royal Thai Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  3. MTZ Polyfilms, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API