Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cates v. Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1987No. 24PA87Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Mitchell

I concur in the result reached and in most of the reasoning contained in the scholarly and thoughtful opinion of the majority. I write separately, however, to express my disagreement with the ground upon which the majority resolves the question of the plaintiffs waiver of the physician-patient privilege. The majority follows Capps v. Lynch, 253 N.C. 18, 23, 116 S.E. 2d 137, 141 (1960) in applying the rule that questions involving waiver of the physician-patient privilege are to be determined largely by the facts and circumstances of the particular case on trial. I am of the view that Capps…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. McNutt v. KeetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Trans-World Investments v. DrobnyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Mull v. StringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API