Cates v. Wilson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1ConcurrenceJustice Mitchell
I concur in the result reached and in most of the reasoning contained in the scholarly and thoughtful opinion of the majority. I write separately, however, to express my disagreement with the ground upon which the majority resolves the question of the plaintiffs waiver of the physician-patient privilege. The majority follows Capps v. Lynch, 253 N.C. 18, 23, 116 S.E. 2d 137, 141 (1960) in applying the rule that questions involving waiver of the physician-patient privilege are to be determined largely by the facts and circumstances of the particular case on trial. I am of the view that Capps…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- State Ex Rel. McNutt v. KeetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Trans-World Investments v. DrobnyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Mull v. StringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.