Legal Opinion
Koenig v. Jewish Child Care Ass'n
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 1986PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
On the particular facts and circumstances presented we agree with the Appellate Division that respondent association occupies the subject apartment as a residential tenant as the lease, itself, provides; that an entity can be a residential tenant under the Rent Stabilization Law; that the apartment is, therefore, subject to the Rent Stabilization Law; and that because petitioner does not meet the requirements of the Code of the Rent Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc. § 54 (A) he is not entitled to a judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sommer v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- MATTER OF SOMMER v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Walter & Samuels, Inc. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by10 opinions
- Manocherian v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Avon Bard Co. v. Aquarian FoundationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Manocherian v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- 501 East 87th St. Realty Co. v. Ole Pa Enterprises Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2002
- 416 W. 47th St. Assocs. Ltd. v. Fountain House, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.