Legal Opinion

Munroe v. City Council for the City of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1976No. 2382PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

ERWIN, Justice.

The Petition for Rehearing filed by appellants is granted for the purpose of clarifying the opinion filed herein.

Appellants assert that the denial of their application for a special exception to the zoning ordinance is not moot. They contend that our dismissal of their prior appeal will collaterally estop them from arguing that the parcel of land taken by the City by eminent domain was amenable to development as a PUD. Thus appellants will not be able to establish the “highest and best use” of the property for valuation purposes in the condemnation action…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lake Falls Ass'n v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Gelpi v. TugwellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  3. Grau v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  4. Allegheny County v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  5. Minor v. LappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Neitzel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  2. Anchorage v. McCabeAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Moses v. McGarveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hilbers v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. LaMoureaux v. Totem Ocean Trailer Express, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API