Legal Opinion
Chuck Blore & Don Richman, Inc. v. 20/20 Advertising Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 8, 1987No. Civ. 4-87-501PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
FACTS
Plaintiff Chuck Blore & Don Richman, Inc. (Blore) is a California advertising agency which designs and produces commercials for television, radio and other mediums. Defendant 20/20 Advertising (20/20) is a Minnesota advertising company also engaged in designing and producing such commercials. Defendant Duling Optical Corporation (Duling), a client of 20/20, is a Delaware corporation specializing in the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Martin Weiner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Thomas Walker v. Time Life Films, Inc., David Susskind, Gill Champion, Martin Richards and Heywood GouldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Durham Industries, Inc. v. Tomy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- RDF Media Ltd. v. Fox Broadcasting Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Creations Unlimited, Inc. v. McCainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- CSM Investors, Inc. v. Everest Development, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Stillman v. Leo Burnett Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Zito v. Steeplechase Films, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.