Legal Opinion

In Re Summons Issued to Ernst & Young, LLP

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 2008No. COA07-1219PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALABRIA, Judge.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“intervenor”) appeals an order denying intervenor’s motion to dismiss and an order compelling Ernst & Young, LLP (“E&Y”) to comply with a North Carolina Department of Revenue Administrative summons. We affirm the order denying the motion to dismiss and remand for an in camera review to determine whether E&Y’s documents are privileged.

In 1995, E&Y provided consulting services to intervenor to implement tax shelters designed to reduce state corporate income taxes. In 1996, E&Y also provided consulting services to establish real estate investment trusts…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Willis v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. United States v. SalterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Summons Issued to Ernst & Young, LLPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Sessions v. SloaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Addison Whitney, LLC v. CashionNorth Carolina Business Court · 2020
  4. Garland v. Orange Cnty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
  5. Matter of Ernst & Young, LLPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API