Legal Opinion
Voigt v. Murphy Heating Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1911No. Docket No. 70PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Rohnert, J. Bill by Edward W. Voigt against the Murphy Heating Company to restrain the breach of a contract. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
In August, 1906, Helen H. Newberry was the owner of a large office building in the city of Detroit. At this time defendant was in the business of furnishing steam from a central plant for heating purposes. The following contract was made:
“Detroit, Mich., August 1, 1906.
“ To Murphy Heating Company:
"The subscriber hereby requests and authorizes you to furnish steam for heating, into the premises at cor. Gris-wold and Earned Sts., now occupied by tenants as office building, and she agrees to use such steam so furnished by you to said premises and pay for the same at the rate of 50 cents per…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Northwestern Cooperage & Lumber Co. v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jawad a Shah Md Pc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Central Power & Light Co. v. PurvisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Leader Co. v. Little Rock Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Cuvrell (In Re F & T Contractors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.