Houtchens v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the case as above).
The appellant presents the points as legal error that (1) the presentment of the complaint by more than one practicing attorney as a petitioner or informant was not permissible, and was an act prejudicial to him in the trial before the jury, and (2) the verification of the complaint was insufficient compliance with the law to give the court jurisdiction. According to the express provisions of the statute, the proceeding for suspension or disbarment of an attorney at law may be instituted by the district court upon its motion or direction or by the complaint…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Ex Parte Milt DupreeTexas Supreme Court · 1907
- Jacobs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Worthen v. State ex rel. VernerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- In re ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Houtchens v. StateTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Rowland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932