Legal Opinion

Rowland v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1932No. 12721PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLattimore, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment suspending for six months Chas. T. Rowland, as an attorney at law, from the practice of law. The complaint was signed by seven practicing-attorneys. While article 314, Rev. Statutes, says “a practicing attorney * * * may file * ⅜ * a sworn complaint,” etc., still there is no statutory prohibition against more than one such joining in the complaint. We are not able to believe that a jury who heard the testimony and were properly instructed as to the law would 'be so unmindful of their oath as to give any evidentiary weight to the fact that seven lawyers signed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boon v. F. M. Weathered's AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. CreasonTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Martin Brown Co. v. PerrillTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Kennedy v. International-Great Northern R. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Ingersol v. McWillieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jody Dawkins Fenslage v. Donald Ray Dawkins, F. H. DawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Industrial Accident Board v. O'DOWDTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Hicks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API