Barlow v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, P.J.
This consolidated appeal involves three civil actions in which the plaintiffs seek damages for injuries sustained as a result of exposure to asbestos-containing products manufactured by the defendants.
Plaintiffs Robert Barlow and William Evans appeal as of right from a circuit court order granting summary disposition to defendant W.R. Grace based on no genuine issue of material fact. MCR 2.116(0(10). Barlow, Evans, and Anthony Michalski appeal as of right from an order dismissing their actions against defendant Crane-Houdaille as a sanction for impeding discovery. MCR 2.313(B) (2). We affirm.
i
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Brisboy v. Fibreboard Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Gamet v. JenksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Peterfish v. FrantzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Beach v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Dykes v. William Beaumont HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Mascarenas v. Union Carbide Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Schutte v. Celotex Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Schultz v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.