Mangum v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
In this case, we are asked to decide whether the State must introduce direct evidence of a recovered firearm’s operability to prove a violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1992 Repl.Vol., 1995 Cum.Supp.) Article 27, § 36B(b). 1 We shall hold that direct evidence is not required, and that operability of a firearm can be proved solely by circumstantial evidence.
I
On the evening of April 24,1993, at approximately 9:30 p.m., off-duty police officer Robert Johnson, Jr. observed Petitioner, Steven Mangum, with a male companion in the lobby of the Motel Six. Johnson saw Mangum repeatedly…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- People v. GeraciNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- United States v. CasamentoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- State v. GosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Mora v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Curtin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.