Legal Opinion

Mangum v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 15, 1996No. 82, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether the State must introduce direct evidence of a recovered firearm’s operability to prove a violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1992 Repl.Vol., 1995 Cum.Supp.) Article 27, § 36B(b). 1 We shall hold that direct evidence is not required, and that operability of a firearm can be proved solely by circumstantial evidence.

I

On the evening of April 24,1993, at approximately 9:30 p.m., off-duty police officer Robert Johnson, Jr. observed Petitioner, Steven Mangum, with a male companion in the lobby of the Motel Six. Johnson saw Mangum repeatedly…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. People v. GeraciNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. CasamentoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. State v. GosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Mora v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Curtin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API