State v. Gray
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
KARWACKI, Judge.
The issue presented in this case is whether the introduction of a nontestifying codefendant’s confession implicating a defendant and others, which is redacted to exclude the names of all those involved in the crime, other than the confessor, by using the words “deleted” and “deletion,” violates a defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if the jury is instructed to consider the confession only against the codefendant-confessor? We shall hold that under the circumstances in this case it does not and reverse…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gray v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Darnita McGhee v. Joan Yukins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- State v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.