Legal Opinion

Teitelbaum v. Massachusetts Accident Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 20, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pbrskie, J.

On May 28th, 1925, the plaintiff, a physician and surgeon, purchased of defendant a contract of indemnification against loss by reason of accident and illness. This contract (policy) among its several provisions, contains the following clauses:

“Part I. Total accident or illness disability. If the insured suffers a disability from accidental injury or disease which necessarily, wholly and continuously disables him from the performance of any and every Tcind of duty pertaining to Ms occupation or business, the company will pay a weekly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nickolopulos v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Connell v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  3. Gross v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
  4. Cheshansky v. Merchants' Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  5. Evans v. Farmers' Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anzano v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  2. Anzano v. Metropolitan Life Ins.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
  3. Parnes v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API