Legal Opinion
Connell v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 14, 1921PublishedCited by 10 opinions
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered, by
Mintukx, J.
The defendant issued its policy of ac-Cident insurance to Charles Boceo, a jitney owner and operator, for the purpose of enabling him to operate his bus in “Passaic, B. J.; Garfield, N. J.; Lodi, N. J., and vicinity,” under the requirements and provisions of chapter 136, laws of 1916 (Pamph. L., p. 283), commonly termed the “Jitney act.” While taking the bus from its accustomed route to Brooklyn to be used fox passenger service in a pending car strike in that municipalitjq Boceo collided with James Connell, a pedestrian, upon Market street,…
2Cited by10 opinions
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McWilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Brynildsen v. Ambassador Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Caruso v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. WerfelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.