Anderson v. Peterson State Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
I. M. OLSEN, Justice.
Appeal by the defendants other than Peterson State Bank from an order denying their motion for a new trial. Included in the motion was a motion for ámended findings of fact and conclusions of law, also denied.
The assignments of error challenge a number of the court’s findings of fact and its conclusions of Iuav. There is the further general assignment that the court erred in refusing to grant the motion for a new trial. The facts are not in dispute.
The brief facts are: The Peterson State Bank was designated as a depository of county funds of Fillmore county to the amount…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Consolidated School District No. 3Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Wentworth v. TubbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Board of County Commissioners v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Radichel v. Federal Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.