Lykins v. Westinghouse Electric
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
SILER, Chief Judge.
This action seeks declaratory and injunc-tive relief, statutory response costs, and common law compensatory damages for individuals who live near a landfill in Laurel County, against corporations which have allegedly illegally dumped hazardous wastes there. On February 29, 1988, the Court dismissed the pendent state law claims. This action is now before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider the Order dismissing the state claims as being pendent, plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint to allege diversity jurisdiction over state claims, and defendants’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
- Steel Valley Authority v. Union Switch And Signal DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Terrence K. v. United States Department of StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Howard v. De CordovaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aquinda v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Lykins v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1989
- Doire v. Synagro Woonsocket, LLCDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2024