Legal Opinion

Aquinda v. Texaco, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 12, 1996No. 93 Civ. 7527 (JSR)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

RAKOFF, District Judge.

Residents of the Oriente region of Ecuador have twice brought class actions against Texaco in the courts of the United States, seeking extensive relief for vast devastation to that region caused by the decades of oil exploration and extraction activities of a consortium over which both Texaco and Ecuador’s state-owned oil company, Petroecuador, have at various times exercised substantial control. 1 The first such action, filed in Har ids County, Texas in late August, 1993 and promptly removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sequihua v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
  2. Conservation Council of Western Australia, Inc. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Fluent v. Salamanca Indian Lease AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Lykins v. Westinghouse ElectricDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1988

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Chevron Corp. v. NaranjoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Republic of Ecuador v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. Jota v. Texaco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Aguinda v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Jota v. Texaco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API