KORDAS v. Sugarbaker
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Appellants, Frank and Marilyn Kordas, sued Dr. Paul H. Sugarbaker for medical malpractice, alleging that he breached the national standard of care when he performed a “second look” surgery on Mr. Kordas. On appeal, appellants argue that the trial court erred in (1) giving the “bad result” instruction and (2) admitting the expert witnesses on behalf of Dr. Sugar-baker because their testimony did not address the national standard of care. We disagree with both contentions and affirm.
I. FACTS
In July of 2002, Mr. Kordas had a colo-noscopy, which was negative, but a CT Scan…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Meek v. ShepardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Strickland v. PinderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Coulter v. Gerald Family Care, P.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Hawes v. ChuaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker ClinicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011