Legal Opinion

Capito v. Topping

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1909PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Separate original applications for peremptory writs of mandamus by Charles Capito, Howard Sutherland, and Z. M. Reese to be directed to C. L. Topping, Clerk of the House of Delegates.

1Opinion of the Court

Poffenbarger Judge:

Ciras. Capito applied to this Court for a peremptory writ of mandamus, 'to compel C. L. Topping, Clerk of the House of Delegates, to certify and deliver to him a copy of a certain document, known and designated in the legislative proceedings, as Senate Bill Ho. 162, a hill to amend and re-enact a certain statute, constituting the 'charter of the city of Charleston, as an act passed by the legislature. Howard Sutherland applied for two such writs, commanding said Topping to certify two other documents, relating to roads, as having become laws. Z. M. Reese also asked such a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Braxton County Court v. West Virginia Ex Rel. State Tax CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Dillon v. County CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Wise v. BiggerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  4. Webster v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Wolfe v. McCaullSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Threadgill v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Allen v. State of West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Carlton v. GrimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API