State v. . Yelverton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, 0. J.,
after stating tbe case: It will be observed tbat tbe vital element of wilfulness, necessary to constitute an abandonment under tbe statute, is omitted from both instructions assigned as errors. Tbe language of tbe statute is as follows: “If any husband shall wilfully abandon bis wife without providing adequate support for such wife, and tbe children which be may have begotten upon her, be shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.” C. S., 4447.
Speaking to a similar situation and interpreting tbe statute in S. v. Johnson, 194 N. C., 378, 139 S. E., 697, it was said: “An offending husband…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. May.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- State v. ToneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- David Thurston v. Kevin FryeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- State v. . CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. . DickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. . HinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- State v. DickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.