Legal Opinion

State v. May.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1903PublishedCited by 32 opinions

INDICTMENT against Erank May, heard by Judge Walter H. Neal and a jury, at June Term, 1902, of the Superior Court of GruiLEORD County. From a verdict of guilty and judgment thereon, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The defendant was indicted under Section 970 of The Code for abandonment, in the following words: “The jurors for the State upon their oaths present that Frank May, late of said County of Guilford, on the .... day of January, 1902, at and in the county aforesaid, unlawfully and wilfully did abandon bis wife, one Mary May, and the children which be, the said Frank May, upon the body of bis said wife bad theretofore begotten, contrary to the statute in such cases made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State.”

There was a second count in the bill of indictment charging the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . WoolardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. State v. . GilchristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. State v. . PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  4. State v. . LeakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  5. State v. HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. State v. CamelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. State v. . WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API