Legal Opinion

Wetzel v. Commercial Chair Company

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 24, 1972No. 1 CA-CIV 1743PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUBANK, Judge.

This appeal raises the question of which : statute of limitations applies to a claim arising from injuries suffered as a result of a defective product (strict liability); negligence, or contract. The trial court applied the two-year statute, A.R.S. § 12-542, 1 in granting appellees summary judgments, while the appellant (plaintiff below) contends that the four-year statute, A.R.S. § 12-550, 2 should control.

The facts are not in dispute. On September 25, 1967, the appellant, an attorney at law, purchased an office chair from the appellee PBSW Corporation, hereafter “PBSW”, which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. OS Stapley Company v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Shippen v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Bailey v. Montgomery Ward and CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Estabrook v. JC Penney CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Romano v. Westinghouse Electric Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
  4. Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Amphitheater Public Schools v. EastmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API