Legal Opinion

Estabrook v. JC Penney Company

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1970No. 9760-PRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

John Michael Estabrook, a minor plaintiff, brought a personal injury action through his guardian ad litem against defendants J. C. Penney Company and Otis Elevator Company. From a trial court order granting defendant “Penneys’ ” motion for a new trial, plaintiff and defendant “Otis” appealed to the Court of Appeals. In Estabrook v. J. C. Penney Co., 10 Ariz. App. 114, 456 P.2d 960 (1969), the . Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s granting of a new trial as to Penneys, and ordered a new trial as to Otis because of the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. OS Stapley Company v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Yoo Thun Lim v. CrespinArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. McGuire v. Valley National Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. McMinnArizona Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Reeves v. MarkleArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Cano v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. State of Arizona v. Robert FischerArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Brown v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  5. Koepnick v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API