Jewett v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in error, who will hereafter be referred to as the defendants, were convieted upon an indictment charging them with conspiracy to violate various provisions of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138% et seq.).
The first assignments raise the question of the sufficiency of the charge. The indictment sets forth clearly that on or about the 1st day of August, 1923, at the city of Seattle, the defendants willfully and unlawfully conspired together to violate the provisions of the National Prohibition Act; it being the plan, purpose, and object of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Goodfriend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. McQueenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Charles Marcus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Imperial Meat Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- State v. WestonOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.