Legal Opinion
Grant v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 12, 1996No. A95A2580PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Presiding Judge.
We granted Jeffrey Grant’s interlocutory application to determine whether the trial court properly denied his motion to suppress. For the reasons set forth herein, we reverse in part.
On May 5, 1992, a search warrant issued for the search of the office of Georgia Southern Lumber, one of Grant’s businesses. The search was executed the following day.
The warrant set forth that the laws being violated were OCGA §§ 16-8-2 (theft by taking) and 16-10-20 (false statements). It listed the things to be searched for as: “letters with landowners, timber companies or participants…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Strauss v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- State v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Ledesma v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Dobbins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hourin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- McBee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- State v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.