Williams v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Judge.
This prosecution arose under, and appellant was convicted of a violation of what is known and will be hereinafter referred to as the Pink Bollworm Act, the same being Chapter 3, Title 4, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, as amended by Chapter 42, Acts of the Regular Session of the 41st Legislature, 1929, and appearing as Arts. 68 to 82, both inclusive, of Vernon’s Annotated Revised Civil Statutes, and Article 1034, Penal Code.
The effect of the charge against appellant was that, during the year 1942, he was in the possession and control of twenty acres of land in Hidalgo…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc. v. LewellenTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RhineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- State v. AllenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.