Legal Opinion
Keystone Redevelopment Partners, LLC. v. Decker
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 16, 2009No. 1:08-cv-2265PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN E. JONES III, District Judge.
THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:
Currently pending before the Court are two motions to dismiss the amended complaint of Plaintiff Keystone Redevelopment Partners, LLC (“Keystone”). Both motions to dismiss (collectively, “the Motions”), filed by Intervenor/Defendant HSP Gaming L.P. (“HSP”) and the Board Defendants respectively, 1 were filed on March 27, 2009. (Doc. 51) (the “HSP Motion”); (Doc. 53) (the “Board Motion”). For the following reasons, we shall grant in part and deny in part the Motions.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Keystone Redevelopment Partners, LLC v. DeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Keystone Redevelopment Partners, LLC v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Keystone Redevelopment Partners, LLC v. DeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Keystone Redevelopment Partners, LLC v. DeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Keystone Redevelpment Partners v. Jeffrey CoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011